Reading a Scientific Paper: Pause. Google every other word. Start again.

Module 2 has definitely been the steepest learning curve yet. When 20.109 req’s said we had to have taken 6.00, I didn’t really understand what we’d do with a programming background. And then they unleashed R. When I check and recheck the instructions for how to program something, I really wish I’d paid more attention to and retained more 6.00. I still have the monsters of this module - the journal presentation and the research article - to come.


With regards to the journal presentation, I selected my paper by reading the abstracts of papers whose titles sounded cool. What I really should’ve have done, though, was taken a peek at the length of the paper I chose: a whopping 40 pages. Thankfully, I had time over spring break to get through it (it literally took me a whole day to read and begin to process). I think the toughest part of reading this paper was remembering what the point of the whole article was - by page 25 and on supplemental figure 5.12 (hehe like 5.12 but not) my head was spinning and I forgot what the original hypothesis was. But, I got through it (I think) and am really excited about the presentation :)
As soon as the journal presentation is over, I’m spending all of my time on this 14 page research article. Wish me luck!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post #2

Edit 4/18 (Forgot to put my name): Justin Liu Originally published 4/8 The Journal Club assignment marked my first time truly understanding a published journal article. Sure, previous UROP positions had required me to get some background information on the project by scanning a few papers. However, all I really did for those was scan the introduction and figures and then have my supervisor actually explain it to me. Thus, I was very unsure of what to expect for this presentation. Will other people care about my presentation? Will I be interested in the material? Will I even be able to understand it? It turns out that the answer to the second and third questions was yes, but I can't exactly speak for the first question. While working on creating the presentation, the most surprising thing was how much of the authors' data that I had to cut out. I felt very reluctant to leave out charts and data that I understood, and it took a lot of mental gymnastics to convince myself tha
Read more

The Journey of A Revision Begins With Office Hours

First major assignment of 20.109 is done, locked in the books. Looking back at it, the entire process from the initial draft to the revisions that were made couldn't have been possible without the availability of the staff and the time spent in office hours.  To the Comm Lab Fellows, thank you for meeting with us at a day's notice. For sitting down and break our abstract apart. For showing us what worked well and what didn't. For helping our abstract go from needs improvement to significantly improved. To Leslie, thank you for bearing with the hundreds of emails we sent your way. For patiently replying to us anytime and every time we needed tips and suggestions. For spending hours in office hours before the first draft was due. For meeting to go over last minute questions before the revision was due.  And to my lab partner, Tooba, thanks for sitting with me late into the night to tear apart our on work. For working with me to identify our weakness and create a s
Read more

I don't hate speaking, just the preparation

Despite my presentation feeling like a dumpster fire, speaking to others about anything, especially when you should technically know more about the subject than the audience, can be pretty fun. Journal club was no exception. However, as fun as the act of presenting is, writing it can be a bit more unappealing and definitely takes a lot more motivation. Reading a paper and being tasked with presenting its most important contents in only a few minutes really forced me to look at what the audience could best take away from the paper, rather than what the authors might have specifically thought to be most important. Seeing shortcomings in the paper, like poorly organized figures or unexplained jargon, now affected me and my future audience and only made me angrier than usual. But as much as a pain as that can be, it's pretty fun to be able to say a paper written by people with far better credentials than yourself isn't the best.  Finally, I thought I had learned from my mistakes
Read more