Dont read this

Words, words, words,

We use them everyday, every second, everywhere, yet when it comes to using them to explain RNA-seq data they just vanish. I struggled hard to explain my RNA-seq data, but I think in the end most of my sentences were coherent thoughts. I think the RNA-seq data was the most difficult part of the research article because of how dense the outputs of the analyses were. 

The one real comment I have about the research involves revision. I feel like the quality of this assignment would be significantly higher had there been a revision step. 

Until next time,

Pedro La Rotta



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post #2

Edit 4/18 (Forgot to put my name): Justin Liu Originally published 4/8 The Journal Club assignment marked my first time truly understanding a published journal article. Sure, previous UROP positions had required me to get some background information on the project by scanning a few papers. However, all I really did for those was scan the introduction and figures and then have my supervisor actually explain it to me. Thus, I was very unsure of what to expect for this presentation. Will other people care about my presentation? Will I be interested in the material? Will I even be able to understand it? It turns out that the answer to the second and third questions was yes, but I can't exactly speak for the first question. While working on creating the presentation, the most surprising thing was how much of the authors' data that I had to cut out. I felt very reluctant to leave out charts and data that I understood, and it took a lot of mental gymnastics to convince myself tha...
Read more

The Journey of A Revision Begins With Office Hours

First major assignment of 20.109 is done, locked in the books. Looking back at it, the entire process from the initial draft to the revisions that were made couldn't have been possible without the availability of the staff and the time spent in office hours.  To the Comm Lab Fellows, thank you for meeting with us at a day's notice. For sitting down and break our abstract apart. For showing us what worked well and what didn't. For helping our abstract go from needs improvement to significantly improved. To Leslie, thank you for bearing with the hundreds of emails we sent your way. For patiently replying to us anytime and every time we needed tips and suggestions. For spending hours in office hours before the first draft was due. For meeting to go over last minute questions before the revision was due.  And to my lab partner, Tooba, thanks for sitting with me late into the night to tear apart our on work. For working with me to identify our weakness and create a s...
Read more

scroll for the haiku

Image
Wow. 109 is over. The moment 12 minutes were up on the timer (well, 12:20, but close enough) I let out a big breath I didn't realize I'd been holding all semester. 109 really was all over (well, apart from the mini-report but, again, close enough). Words can't possibly describe the experience I've had this semester. @Future 109-ers if you were scared off by the Mod 2 report and contemplated quitting science for good, I promise Mod 3 is a game changer. We walked into Prof Belcher's lecture one day, eyes drooping and brains broken post 14-page report, to play with lemons, oranges, and apples to make batteries (and also get to eat some breakfast!). We finished the module by proposing to build a viral detection system using a shrink gun (im not kidding). It was such a cool experience to play around with ground breaking research and come up with a proposal that sounded pretty?? fancy?? sciencey?? Also, for a moment there, I kinda forgot this wasn't a real pitch...
Read more