Some Mod1 thoughts


Sometimes, I’ll start reading a paper, think it’s really interesting, and just dive into the rabbit hole of looking through the references, and then through the references of the references, and then the references of the references of the references and you get the idea. I’ll admit it, I just really enjoy reading papers. Or so I thought.

I didn’t realize until we started making figures and writing figure captions for the Mod1 assignments that writing any sort of concise, yet thorough scientific report is really such a struggle. First, I would always spend way too much time painstakingly editing the figures in Google Slides because I have absolutely zero Photoshop skills, then when it came to the caption, I always started incorrectly by interpreting the data, and above all, I was constantly trying to find the balance between spoon-feeding every detail and outlining just the big picture. Basically, no matter how hard I tried, my figures were never even close to the quality of real figures in real papers! At some point during Mod1, I think I even began to resent all of the papers I was reading they made my scientific writing skills seem so inadequate.

But, as time went on, I started getting really specific and helpful feedback from Leslie on my assignments and after getting suggestions from my Comm Lab appointment, I felt increasingly more adequate (shout out to Tyler for going light on the criticism part of constructive criticism!). Overall, it was very nice to be able to do small scientific writing assignments because I got feedback with every assignment and was able to slowly improve for the next one. And, even though I barely survived data summary, looking back at it, I’m thankful for the practice. Because of Mod1, I now appreciate good scientific writing infinitely more.

My scientific writing skills on the other hand are definitely a work in progress, but on the bright side, I guess at least I like reading papers again.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post #2

Edit 4/18 (Forgot to put my name): Justin Liu Originally published 4/8 The Journal Club assignment marked my first time truly understanding a published journal article. Sure, previous UROP positions had required me to get some background information on the project by scanning a few papers. However, all I really did for those was scan the introduction and figures and then have my supervisor actually explain it to me. Thus, I was very unsure of what to expect for this presentation. Will other people care about my presentation? Will I be interested in the material? Will I even be able to understand it? It turns out that the answer to the second and third questions was yes, but I can't exactly speak for the first question. While working on creating the presentation, the most surprising thing was how much of the authors' data that I had to cut out. I felt very reluctant to leave out charts and data that I understood, and it took a lot of mental gymnastics to convince myself tha
Read more

The Journey of A Revision Begins With Office Hours

First major assignment of 20.109 is done, locked in the books. Looking back at it, the entire process from the initial draft to the revisions that were made couldn't have been possible without the availability of the staff and the time spent in office hours.  To the Comm Lab Fellows, thank you for meeting with us at a day's notice. For sitting down and break our abstract apart. For showing us what worked well and what didn't. For helping our abstract go from needs improvement to significantly improved. To Leslie, thank you for bearing with the hundreds of emails we sent your way. For patiently replying to us anytime and every time we needed tips and suggestions. For spending hours in office hours before the first draft was due. For meeting to go over last minute questions before the revision was due.  And to my lab partner, Tooba, thanks for sitting with me late into the night to tear apart our on work. For working with me to identify our weakness and create a s
Read more

I don't hate speaking, just the preparation

Despite my presentation feeling like a dumpster fire, speaking to others about anything, especially when you should technically know more about the subject than the audience, can be pretty fun. Journal club was no exception. However, as fun as the act of presenting is, writing it can be a bit more unappealing and definitely takes a lot more motivation. Reading a paper and being tasked with presenting its most important contents in only a few minutes really forced me to look at what the audience could best take away from the paper, rather than what the authors might have specifically thought to be most important. Seeing shortcomings in the paper, like poorly organized figures or unexplained jargon, now affected me and my future audience and only made me angrier than usual. But as much as a pain as that can be, it's pretty fun to be able to say a paper written by people with far better credentials than yourself isn't the best.  Finally, I thought I had learned from my mistakes
Read more